Monday, December 8, 2008

Muslim Criminal Jihad: The Filling of Europe’s Prisons

Muslims, far from being model “NEW EUROPEANS," are in fact (to nobody’s surprise) devastatingly OVER-REPRESENTED in jails across Europe.

You might want to take a look at the number of Muslims in some countries listed below, which can be found at “Muslims in EU Cities: Background research reports”

And then when cross reference that with reliable statistics, the results are not unexpected. 


Belgium - 
While Muslims represent between 4 and 5 per cent of Belgium's entire population, 35 per cent of the incarcerated population is of Muslim descent.


Denmark - about 20 percent of inmates are Muslim background.

See the original Danish here :

Of Google translation to English here:


England+Wales - 
11 percent of all prisoners in contrast to Muslims being just 3 percent of the country's population at the last census in 2001


France – 
60 to 70 percent of all inmates in the country's prison system are Muslim, according to Muslim leaders, sociologists and researchers, though Muslims make up only about 12 percent of the country's population.


Italy - 
Among the large number of foreign nationals held in Italian prisons are Albanians, Tunisians, Algerians and Moroccans.
The statistics show a substantial increase in the detention of immigrants particularly from Morocco, Romania, Tunisia and Nigeria in the past two years.


Spain –The government of Dubai states that that 70 percent of those in Spanish jails are Muslims, who number around 54,000.
Spain with its 40-million population, which is 94 percent Catholic, has a Muslim community of around 600,000.


None of this is surprising, as many of the charged individuals would of course only be carrying out the duties of a Muslim. 

From the rape of uncovered women, and honour killings, to intafada on European streets, to extracting the jizzya from real Europeans in the form of violent criminal Jihad, to forcing the dhimmis to feel themselves subdued and humiliated. (Sura 9:29).

The question is: What is it about Muslims and why are they so obscenely over represented? 

This is not the case with other immigrant groups and is a question that Muslims should indeed ponder, and attempt to find the roots of this criminality. 

Because Two Eyes Are Too Sexy, Saudi Cleric Favours One-Eye Veil

Islam is barbaric and a great destroyer of Human Rights. No one, in their right mind could argue otherwise. For the Muslims, please explain why women who already treated as though they are lower than animals with no freedom, ---- could actually need to cover both eyes now?

The usual suspects along with their useful idiots I am sure have no real idea what Islam is, and will spout that it is being taken "out of context". However, no thinking, educated, rational human being on the planet could agree with this, or the way Islam treats women (other than Gilliane, of course).

A Muslim cleric in Saudi Arabia has called on women to wear a full veil, or niqab, that reveals only one eye.

Sheikh Muhammad al-Habadan said showing both eyes encouraged women to use eye make-up to look seductive. 

The question of how much of her face a woman should cover is a controversial topic in many Muslim societies. 

The niqab is more common in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf, but women in much of the Muslim Middle East wear a headscarf which covers only their hair. 

Sheikh Habadan, an ultra-conservative cleric who is said to have wide influence among religious Saudis, was answering questions on the Muslim satellite channel al-Majd. 

BBC Admits to Pro-Muslim Bias

BBC programme-makers tackle Islam differently from Christianity, its director general has admitted. 

Mark Thompson was responding to criticism from comedian Ben Elton.

"The BBC is simply not bothered about offending Christians despite the majority of this country being of that faith."


The BBC can't kick its addiction to bias 

Yesterday, the BBC Trust published From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel, an 81-page report with the subtitle "Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st century". 
That's a bit like the late Boris Yeltsin talking about safeguarding his sobriety. 

Ah yes, Israel. One of the few BBC journalists criticised in yesterday's report was Barbara Plett, who burst into tears when Yasser Arafat was airlifted out of his compound and then boasted about it in an article. She was caught red-handed, in other words; the incident became famous and so the report produces her as a burnt offering.


BBC Internal Memo Admits Anti-Christian BiasCompany executives admitted the corporation is dominated by homosexuals

At the secret meeting in London last month, which was hosted by veteran broadcaster Sue Lawley, BBC executives admitted the corporation is dominated by homosexuals and people from ethnic minorities, deliberately promotes multiculturalism, is anti-American, anti-countryside and more sensitive to the feelings of Muslims than Christians.


We are biased, admit the stars of BBC News

It was the day that a host of BBC executives and star presenters admitted what critics have been telling them for years: the BBC is dominated by trendy, Left-leaning liberals who are biased against Christianity and in favour of multiculturalism.

It reveals that executives would let the Bible be thrown into a dustbin on a TV comedy show, but not the Koran, and that they would broadcast an interview with Osama Bin Laden if given the opportunity.


BBC, NY Times and Guardian Appear to Have Stage-Managed Muslim Anti-Pope Hatred Ratzinger, now Benedict, has been favorite Catholic target of liberal media for years


Yes, we are biased on religion and politics, admit BBC executives

BBC executives have been forced to admit what critics have known for years - that the corporation is institutionally biased.
The revelation came after details of an 'impartiality' summit called by its chairman, Michael Grade, were leaked.
Senior figures admitted that the BBC is guilty of promoting Left-wing views and an anti-Christian sentiment.
They also said that as an organisation it was disproportionately over-represented by gays and ethnic minorities.


Bloated, Biased and Creaky. A sitcom legend explains why the BBC must be broken up

A year-long investigation concludes that the BBC stifles debate on major political issues, because of liberal attitudes amongst the staff.


Sikhs and Hindus accuse BBC of pro-Muslim bias

A link to many of the Muslim bias of the BBC. Item by item.


BBC NEWS | Entertainment | BBC 'must become more impartial'

The BBC comments on their own bias. 
The report also quoted former political editor Andrew Marr, who said the BBC has an "innate liberal bias".

. The impartial BBC news. 

Hindu Holocaust

he blood lust that Muslims have is legendary. When looking around the world, it is plain for anyone to see that "Islam has bloody boarders." None of this violence created by Islam is in dispute. However, one often overlooked crime against humanity is the Holocaust perpetrated by Muslims against Hindus. 

French historian Francois Gautier puts its like this "Let it be said right away: the massacres perpetrated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese."
Nobody knows how many deaths have there has been over 700 year span of islamic rule over india but estimates are inbetween 70-80 million and tens of millions more converted to muslims. Many of these were recorded by the muslims themselves or there secrataries at the time they were committing these crimes."

Also see how Jihad has created a-genocide-in-the-making, that has been proceeding for decades with little more than the occasional whimper. 

When Bangladesh won its independence from Pakistan in 1971, Hindus made up almost one in five of its citizens. 

Today, they are less than one in ten. 
Demographers and others estimate that approximately 20 million 
Bangladeshi Hindus have disappeared.

Inbreeding and its effects on Genetic and Mental Disorders Among Muslims

I would like to open a discussion on this board on the subject of Muslim inbreeding and the effect it has had on the genetic, and more importantly the mental disorders that it has created on a vast amount of the global Muslim population. 

The practice of interfamily marriage is still relatively common among Arabs because of the structure of the Arabic society. Arabs, are organized in tribes based on common ancestry, and when it comes to marriage, the only opportunity is to inbreeding is more than common. 

This social structure has been common in the Arabic desert (now countries) for centuries. .

Most humans learned from experience millennia ago of its devastating affect inbreeding has upon the offspring. 

(Please see here the effects of inbreeding: )

The question is why does the practice persist among Arabs in face of severe genetic consequences? 

Several factors might be involved here including religion, education, socioeconomic status and culture.

The effects on the genetic pool of the Arabic lands after centuries of this practice have been devastating.

“Spinal muscular atrophy and the gene that causes it, along with several other serious genetic disorders, are common across the Arab world today an average because even today, 45 percent of married couples are related, 
Widespread inbreeding in Saudi Arabia has produced many genetic disorders, including the blood diseases of thalassemia, a potentially fatal hemoglobin deficiency, and sickle cell anemia. Spinal muscular atrophy and diabetes are also very common, especially in the regions with the longest traditions of marriage between relatives. There are also found links between inbreeding and deafness and muteness.


Now one could say this could be considered an Arab cultural practice not linked to Islam.However, when one looks at the only reliable data for other Muslims (non racial Arabs), they come from Western countries that have accepted an unprecedented influx of Muslims immigrants, and are now paying the financial as well as social costs of this Muslim practice. 


The problem within the Pakistani community in the UK , with regards to birth defects and the drain it is creating on resources has become so severe that the British government is now issuing warnings to its Muslim Pakistani immigrant community. 

“Now (Too late?) the UK is issuing an official warning about Muslim inbreeding. 
(February 10, 2008 article in the Times Online, )

Medical research suggests that while British Pakistanis are responsible for 3% of all births, they account for one in three British children born with genetic illnesses.

“If you talk to any primary care worker they will tell you that levels of disability among the . . . Pakistani population are much higher than the general population. And everybody knows it’s caused by …[ interbreeding ].

These problems of genetic illness are not found in the Hindu Indian population in the UK, and when one considers that Pakistani and Indian people are of the same race, (previously of the same culture – but still quite similar ) but have been separated religiously since the Arab invasions and Islamisation, of the sub-continent. 

It would seem, using deductive logic that historically the only link these different cultures have is Islam. 

I will continue this investigation soon, time permitting. Before I do, those Muslims interested might also wish to research the effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation. 

(Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation)

The question to think about is: Could the practice of interbreeding be the key to the success and longevity of Islam? Could it be that the genetic and mental illnesses borne of interbreeding are a factor in the unquestioning nature of the majority of Muslims regarding spirituality? 

As hard as these numbers are to look at (from scientific journals, government health , financial and social ministries) I would like your opinion on some further research I have found that could be linked to the debilitating effects of Muslim inbreeding on social status and poverty (Using the UK as the example)

Before I begin, please see this website, The Poverty Site. 
United Kingdom

Low income and ethnicity

Now, the typical politically correct person in the Western world would say that the only reason for the failure of any particular group in the Western world is totally, and completely the fault of the indigenous people (i.e. it is the racism of the native that halts the economic process of non-whites). 

As stated in the Post above, Pakistanis, Bengalis and Indians come from the same basic racial group, and this is where my investigation ran into some startling statistics. 

For example, ”more than half of people from Bangladeshi and Pakistani ethnic backgrounds live in low-income households. 

By contrast, a quarter of people from an Indian ethnic background live in low-income households,” 

*******only a bit higher than the rate for White people.****

Now if Indian Hindus are basically on economic parity with White British, then the charge of racism, that the Muslims of the UK suffer from discrimination and therefore the fault for their economic failure is the cause of white people is totally discredited. 

That almost half of Muslim people from the Subcontinent live in poverty but only 25% of the Hindu population (roughly equal with the white population) live in poverty, then their has to be another reason, than the tired excuse of blaming native British people for their failure. 

The statistics become even more alarming when you consider these facts. 

"Among those in working families, around 55% of Bangladeshis, 45% of Pakistanis and 30% of Black Africans are in low income. These rates are much higher than the 10-15% for White British, White other and Indians." 

Of course the facts presented in this post will ruffle the more politically correct individuals on this board, but the question remains, and do you see a link with the massive inbreeding of the Muslim population and the devastating affects that it has on said population and the economic position the majority of these people find themselves in? 

And what, other than a ban on interbreeding could be done to help them?